For various reasons, I’ve always thought that it would be fun to Tweet the book of Philippians. I shared some of this madness with our church yesterday as I preached Philippians 4:10-20 in preparation for our week of vacation Bible school.
Here is what the text could look like, Tweeted.
v. 10 – I thought you had 4gotten me. Whew #justintime
V. 11– #igotthis#contentment #stateofmind
V. 12—I’ve had everything and I’ve had nothing and I know the #secret of both.
V. 13–#icandoallthings #Jesus #winners!
V. 14—You are awesome #generous
V. 15—I can’t believe no one else sent help to me at all – just you, you’ve always been there for me. #thankyou #MacedoniaMissionsTrip
V.16—@baptistchurchofThessaloniki are slackers! Sad.
Vote in my highly unscientific poll. Which person will President Trump fire next?
Whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit, he is on quite a roll. Last week he fired his Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and then fired Andrew McCabe over at the FBI on Friday night, a mere twenty-six hours before his pension would have kicked in. Technically it was Jeff Sessions who did it, but everyone knows the order came from POTUS.
Now I’m wondering, who will he fire next? I predicted he would fire Jeff Sessions before July 4 LAST YEAR (click here to read that blog I wrote after Comey was fired). It might still be a safe bet he’ll be fired because, as I pointed out then, the first rule of an assassination is to kill the assassin. Sessions did the dirty work, now he’s got to go, too. As you vote, and for future clarity, remember a resignation counts here, because we all know those are ‘fall on your sword’ type things. For example, I suspect H. R. McMaster will not be fired, but will resign and that is the same, for our purposes here, as a termination.
So, vote below on who you think will get the axe next. Remember, you have to click on the “vote” button for it to go through, after that, you should be able to see how the voting is going.
yeah, i’m looking at you NPRThe story sounds like a drug-inspired paranoia trip. But here it goes.
Some conspiracy whack jobs on the interwebs told everyone that a pizza shop in Washington D.C. was a front for child-sex trafficking and satanic illuminati shenanigans. The conspiracy loons said Hillary Clinton was involved. Their mindless bilge was all propagated as news, when in fact it was fake-news. Fake-news seems to be more profitable than real news.
People believed these lies unconditionally and didn’t bother to check the facts or consider the source.
Death threats were made. Innocent people were harassed. Someone went into the pizzeria and shot off a couple of rounds from an assault rifle. He said he was investigating the claims about Clinton.
I told you it sounded crazy, didn’t I?
In my novel The Little Girl Waits (which you should buy right now) I have a scene where the traffickers are using an auto repair shop as a front for their evil, and the good guys go in to investigate. It is one of the better scenes in the book, IMHO. But that is fiction. This loon took a real rifle into a real pizza restaurant. A PIZZA RESTAURANT! That is not fiction.
So, the next time someone tells me that the elements in my novel aren’t “believable” I’m just gonna point to this.
I’ve come to think that believability in a story is slightly overrated. (By the way, have you bought my novel The Little Girl Waits yet? Go Ahead and get the follow-up to it, How Great is The Darkness while you’re at it.) When I pick up a novel to read, I don’t want it to look exactly like my everyday world. I want it to be different. I want the unexpected. I want to see believable characters in unbelievable situations. In fact, I like that sentence so much, I’m gonna set it off in its own quote bracket to highlight the point like they do in fancy publications.
I want to see believable characters in unbelievable situations
This gets back to another thing I believe in so deeply. Character trumps plot. We love characters. We tolerate plots. The plot only exists to reveal the integrity and grit (or lack thereof) of the character(s). I’ll use Harry Potter because it is so easy. The plot of what is going on and the whose it, spell it, when it, is very inconsequential. We care about Harry, his friends, Dumbledore, and the showdown with Voldemort. The characters are the plot.
Of course, the plot matters. I don’t mean to say it doesn’t have a role to play in the development of a good story. What I am saying is that character development matters far more, and it is the characters that keep the reader engaged. The moment the reader stops caring about the character he or she is likely to put the book down and go turn the television on and watch the Gilmore Girls–because that is all character.
But back to the pizza shop. It is actually a place called Comet Ping Pong Pizza. Disclosure–I’ve never been there, so the pizza might be lousy.
I think they should lawyer-up and start the lawsuits. If I owned that business, I would sue everyone I could find that pushed that fake news story. I’m not generally litigation happy, but for crying-out-loud there needs to be some accountability here. Free speech is important, but I can’t shout, “Fire” in a movie theater and fake news propagators must be held accountable.
There are two problems at play here, as I see it. The first problem is, as this (click here) article on slate points out, conspiracies to hurt children exist. One only has to think of Jerry Sandusky at Penn State or the Catholic Diocese of Boston highlighted in the film Spotlight. It is sickening to think about, but true. The second problem, though, is different. It is the problem that we attribute the worst possible societal crime to our political opponents. It is not enough to suspect a child-sex ring, but somehow it must be Hillary Clinton’s fault. Before the progresses get all high and mighty about this, they need to realize they are equally to blame when they all but accuse Donald Trump of having white hoods in his closet.
This is all problematic. But you know what else is problematic–who we blame. If I hear one more person blame “the internet” or “social media” for this (yeah, I’m looking at you NPR), I’m gonna do something serious like eat an apple without washing it first. Dont’ try me!
This is not the internet’s fault. The internet is neutral, like a car. You can drive it wherever you want. The internet takes you places and grants you conversation. The problem is not the medium. The problem is that people have lost the ability to think critically. I don’t when it happened, somewhere since my childhood the important skill of analysis has vaporized.
Fake news stories have been here, since, like, forever! The National Enquirer was based on it in my childhood. People read it, but they knew it was garbage.
Somehow we’ve lot the ability to chuckle at the stupidity and move on.
The reason is we want to believe the garbage.
It reminds me a bit of my theology of zombies. You read that right. Zombies have a theology. The short of it is that the zombie genre and our fascination with it hints at a deep down feeling of unease that we have with our life. We have a sense that something is out of balance, something is not quite right in the world, and we are just one bad moment from ending the whole thing. This thinking has crept into our political world. We expect there to be a political apocalypse any day now, when our darkest nightmares are confirmed. It is fatalism that flows from a lack of spirituality. To read more about the theology of zombies, click here.
Therefore, the political enemy must, necessarily, be completely evil. He or she can’t just be wrong on the issue or the policy, he must be completely evil. So George Bush was compared with Hitler, Obama was a secret Muslim, Trump is a Nazi, Clinton is the Illuminati, and on and on and on. This kind of though pollutes our national discourse.
One more thought. Chew on this for a bit. A pastor friend of mine shared this week that someone he knew refused to pray for peace because he believed that the world needed to get worse and worse so that Jesus would come back.
That is how you end up with assault rifles at pizza joints where people are looking for presidential candidates sacrificing children.
I have written about it many times–Here on this blog, in sermons, and in my novel “How Great Is The Darkness.”
It is a problem that continues to haunt our society, and my prayers are for healing and reconciliation, justice and peace.
The causes of justice and reconciliation, peace and healing are hindered when the issue is trivialized, or worse yet, mislabeled.
Of course I am referring to Usain Bolt and Ellen DeGeneres. Specifically, I am referring to this picture and tweet that have been causing quite the firestorm.
Disclaimer #1: I am not a big fan of Ellen DeGeneres. Mrs. Greenbean and the sprouts like her, but me, not so much.
Disclaimer #2: I have watched about five minutes of the Olympics. It was fencing. I felt like I’d paid my patriotic obligation and turned the channel to something that interested me far more.
There is no way, in any universe, that what Ellen did was racist. If she doesn’t celebrate Bolt’s incredible achievement then that could be racist–not giving him his due–but this, this is just the way people interact with each other.
But enough already about the facts of this specific circumstance. There are two factors at work here that are detrimental to the fabric of our society. I know that sentence is frightening, but I think it is true.
Factor One: Free Speech
The desired effect people who claim this is racism want is to shut Ellen up. The call on the Twitterverse was not so much for an apology from Ellen, but a call to remove the ‘offensive’ image. The use of terms such as offensive, racist, homophobic, mean-spirited, hate speech, sexist and other labels has grown to have a stifling power on speech.
It is undeniably true that people say racist, offensive, homophobic and other mean things. Yet, if our society is to continue as a free one, people must be free to be jerks. No one has the right to not be offended. You do have the right to change the channel, close the book, walk away, argue the point, or be a moron.
What we have is a kind of new McCarthyism in which certain elites have control of what people can and cannot say. Will we ever learn from our past?
Factor Two: The Real Issues
By focusing upon trivial issues like a Photoshopped picure of an Olympic athlete and entertainer, people vent their anger about racism without addressing the real issues. We have deep problems of violence, unequal access to the law, education disparity, income inequality, little or no access to medical care, a housing gap, not to mention the violence done to people of color by the inequities of the criminal justice system.
But let’s not deal with that. Instead let’s conflagrate a non-issue so we can feel like we’ve done something significant, like Tweet obscenities and calling people names.