Review of critical facts is often the most important aspect of learning, and learning is what separates competent people from the incompetent. With that in mind, here are two important facts we’ve learned this week.
1. We learned that we should never take nude pictures of ourselves on our smartphone.
These pictures will inevitably end up published by thieves and criminals. We all agree, I think, that these thieves and criminals should be punished to the furthest extent of the law. I actually would go one step further. People who view these images on the internet are, in comparison, the same as people who knowingly buy stolen parts for their car at a chop shop. So, some level of prosecution should go out to these people. If the feds will go after teenagers who download illegal music, why not go after people who go search out illegally obtained pictures. These photos are stolen goods, and should be treated accordingly.
However, once the damage is done, once people have seen your southern zones, you can’t put that genie back in the bottle.
If you must take naked pictures of yourself (which I strongly recommend against) use an old fashioned Polaroid and hide them in your sock drawer. Greenbean promises that you’ll never find nude pictures of him on the internet. Never.
2. We learned that Joel and Victoria Osteen are not theologians.
This really is not news. However, Victoria highlighted that fact a bit when a video surfaced of her saying this:
When we obey God, we’re not doing it for God…we’re doing it for ourself. Because God takes pleasure when we’re happy. Do good ’cause God wants you to be happy. When you come to church, when you worship Him, you’re not doing it for God, really. You’re doing it for yourself because that’s what makes God happy.
Okay, give me a moment to take off the cool Panama Jack hat I’m wearing right now and replace it with the theologian hat. Good, now I can think straight. Let’s analyze what is wrong with her statement. First, she implies that somehow our behavior makes God happy. The reverse of this would be that our behavior can make God sad. This kind of talk about the Lord borders on tribal religion where the key task is to determine if the Almighty Reese’s Pieces God is happy today or if we need to appease his unhappiness with libations of milk and offerings of peanut butter. Is God happy today or sad today? Let’s find out? Who brought the holy coconut?
Proper Christian theology teaches us that the Lord exists in perfect trinitarian community: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Scriptures teach us that the Lord becomes angry at some actions and delights in others, however it is never implied that he is sitting around in Heaven waiting for us to make him happy, as if his happiness depended upon us.
If God is waiting for us to make him happy, then his existence is likely the saddest in all of creation.
The second mistake she makes is that she puts human beings at the center of the worship expression. That is beyond wrong. However, it would be difficult to argue that most American Christians practice anything other than a worship experience that ‘makes me happy.’ So, though wrong, Osteen has plenty of company in her idolatrous doctrine of human-centric worship.
Now, here is the twist to what we learned this week. Osteen, for all her failings, is actually tip-toeing up to something important. Our lives are happier, better, more enriched when when we follow the Lord and live according to his ways. I have argued for years that even if there were no such thing as the supernatural, no eternal life, and no spiritual joy, I would still preach that the Jesus way of life is the best way of life because it is.
That doesn’t minimize the supernatural or argue against the power of God or eternity, but it speaks to the power of the ethics and pathos in the life of a Christ-follower. It would have been better if Osteen had said it that way, because that might have been what she kind of intended. However, she didn’t, because, neither she nor her husband have taken the time to learn from people smarter than them about actual theology. They’ve been too busy making an empire and playing a role–the role of superstar celebrity.
image from cinemablend.com
8 responses to “WEEK IN REVIEW–WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED”
So, nothing new under the sun, eh?
well, yeah, but that is only seven words. i kind of need to fill the blog with something. 🙂
Looks like a picked a good week to shut off the religious Interverse. Well, really, any week is a good week to shut it off, I guess. Every week offers a wealth of insanity, as Matt and Solomon succinctly put it.
well put virgl. i have found that matt shares all of solomon’s wise characteristics, but none of his foolish womanizing, idolatrous, slave-driving characteristics.
Never ever take nude pictures of yourself. Ever. Especially not on any electronics that can be in any way connected to the internet. But because physical pictures can be stolen as well, just for good measure, don’t do it. I wish that were more common sense.
As for Jennifer Lawrence, she seemed to have less of a celebrity head on her, so I thought she’d have more common sense than that.
you’re right on the money carly. although, i’ve given up hope that most people have common sense. thanks for reading and commenting!
I think your next to the last paragraph may disagree with Paul who seemed to think that we would be of all men the most pitiable. Otherwise, I think your points are well made. Theology is little esteemed and so there is a lot of bad theology around. Keep preaching.
carroll–thanks for commenting. yeah, i’m familiar with paul’s words in 1 corinthians 15. i think he is talking about the idea of hope there, which is different from my point. my point is not the idea of missing hope, but the idea that the Jesus way of life is just a better way to live than a non-Jesus way. in other words, i don’t think i’m sacrificing anything in this life hoping for a paying off in the next. i think the joy and contentment of living for Jesus now is equal blessing for now. eternity is just double bonus, which is a double grace. at least, that is my take.